Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Article. Show all posts

Tuesday, 18 October 2011

Oasis500 observations and lessons


Oasis500 observations and lessons


Main objectives

  • To fund and
  •  accelerate 500 companies in
  •  5years and
  •  boost the valuation and
  •  revenues of companies


Tools and mechanisms to achieve the objectives
  •  Utilizing the expats and local experience in running the project, mentoring, investments and services offerings
  •  Enroll applicants in a Boot camp
  •  Provide services like training and mentoring
  •  Provide a networking platform for entrepreneurs (with business people, policy makers, investors, serial entrepreneurs)
  •  Linkage with angel investors
  •  Injections of 10k JOD as a seed fund investment for the successful teams (in exchange for 10% ownership of the firm)
Boot camp for entrepreneurs
  •  Is the first activity when they join the program
  •  Is a training and selection process
  •  Engagement in 100 days of acceleration program
  •  Involvement with mentors and experts to provide guidance
  Objective to:
  • file Ideas
  • select the people behind the ideas
  • select committed people to their business
  • help in testing the ideas and if they fail to fail fast and start over with a new idea
  • help in making quick decision when to pump capital in promising ideas


Note: this article has been written based on personal opinion and observations of Oasis500 activities.


For more information about Oasis500 check the website at www.oasis500.com

Google Ibdaa Program in Egypt


Google Ibdaa Program in Egypt

Google has recently announced a new entrepreneurship support program in Egypt and here are the links:
This Google activity is not the only one in the MENA region, several multinational IT companies like Cisco and Microsoft are developing and supporting entrepreneurship and innovation programs to increase the awareness and improve the capabilities of the nations of youth.
Here I will try to highlight the main interesting points I found in the new Google program, you can have a look at the program details in the above links.

The main objective of the program is to spread the awareness and motivation of entrepreneurs
-          in 7 months
-          training of 200 entrepreneurs
-          qualify 100 entrepreneurs and link them to investors
-          start 50 companies
-          one entrepreneur will win a prize of 200K USD

·         The program/competition name is Ibdaa meaning Start (as an activity or action: start doing) which I believe they have selected it wisely to encourage on acting rather waiting for the support.
·         The program is promoted as a competition not as a support program and for that I have the following points:
1.       Participants have to work and be active to earn the prize and not to apply and pass the evaluation criteria to be involved in the program
2.       Might attract the right people who are willing to work, learn and compete to earn the prize not those who are just applying to get a fund for free.
3.       The participants have to work hard to earn the prize focus on what they will do, not what the program will do for them to earn the fund and support.

·         The organizers utilize the local entrepreneurs’ success stories to promote the program (at least that what appears in the video). This approach encourages young entrepreneurs to see if those older and local entrepreneurs have done it locally so they can do it.
·         The competition is not about a business plan development, it is a competition to start and realize the business ideas. So it should attract only committed applicants to realize their business not those looking for money. The real prize will be realizing the company and the extra prize will be the funding by the program.

The main support activities are:
-          Training
-          Networking
-          Mentoring
-          Prizes
-          linkage with investors

Further details about the implementation and the process of this program which includes boot camp, several stages of evaluation and presentations to experts, mentors and investors are available in the website of the program.

Sunday, 21 August 2011

Who are the Entrepreneurs? Entrepreneurs are the successful Alchemists


Who are the Entrepreneurs?
Entrepreneurs are the successful Alchemists

During Rick Salmon’s visit to Palestine Rick conducted a workshop discussing investment opportunities for entrepreneurs.

I will in this article and the following ones start summarizing my opinions based on Rick’s notes and the discussions in the workshop.
I will start with who is the entrepreneur and what characteristics the entrepreneur should have. (Some found characteristics are based on studies)

The entrepreneur is Alchemist of the modern world. Alchemist is the one who works in Alchemy and according to Wikipedia

Alchemy is an ancient tradition, the primary objective of which was the creation of the mythical "philosopher's stone," which was said to be capable of turning base metals into gold or silver, and also act as an elixir of life that would confer youth and immortality upon its user”


An Alchemist endeavors to turn base metals into gold while the entrepreneur drives to turn opportunities into successful business. This analogy between the entrepreneurs and alchemists is not only about gold or money it is about the drive to transform the low value into high value.


An Alchemist is committed to what he is doing and is stubborn to turn metals into gold, and the entrepreneur is the same as he is committed to bring his idea to reality and he is a great believer in his idea and stubborn in achieving it.

One of the skills the entrepreneur has is that he can look at positive things and find opportunities instead of barriers or problems and tries to overcome the barriers by utilizing new innovative approaches. This is the same with the alchemist who looks for every new way and tries different opportunities to get the gold.

Although the entrepreneur keeps trying different opportunities sometimes he succeeds and other times he fails, he learns from both the success and the failure and build experience from that and lead his ideas, team and new opportunities into better position. Failures are seen as speed bumps rather than barriers and encourage entrepreneurs to look for options in their approach. Alchemists historically were driven by the creation of gold.The byproduct of their experiments contributed to the humanity countless innovations that may never have been discovered. Alchemists learned from their trial and errors and helped in the formulation of the science of chemistry we know today.

Alchemists faced lot of risks while trying their experiments which is similar what the entrepreneur faces every day in leading his ideas into success and market.

One of the hardest things in the world the entrepreneur tries to do which is harder than combining material to get gold, is creating win-win human relations.  An entrepreneur is an alchemist at combining people together.


Finally, alchemists are crazy as are most entrepreneurs. Both are driven by what could be rather than being limited by what is and has been. This helps them in introducing innovative solution by not thinking as the rest of the others, as Innovation comes from creative with persistence.


To summarize entrepreneurs have the following characteristics:
  • Commitment to achieve their ideas (sometimes stubborn , driven and persistent);
  • They see and seek opportunities rather than focusing on barriers or what has been;
  • They keep trying alternative solutions and learn from results and gain experience
  • They are risk takers and treat their failures as learning opportunities
  • An entrepreneur is an alchemist at combining people together.

The next article will be: When the Entrepreneur falls in love.

References and Thanks

Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Leading Older Employees - Jodi Glickman - Harvard Business Review

Leading Older Employees - Jodi Glickman - Harvard Business Review

Very interesting article on how to deal and lead older employees. This article suggests three tips


  1. Be Confident
  2. Be Open Minded
  3. Solicit Feedback Regularly

Sunday, 12 June 2011

Wishful Thinking – Greatest Enemy of Today’s Entrepreneur

Wishful Thinking – Greatest Enemy of Today’s Entrepreneur


It is important to be passionate about your idea but do not be biased to it. Keep your thinking clear

Saturday, 4 June 2011

Ideas vs. Implementation Plans

Entrepreneurs Need Fewer Hot Ideas and More Plans
This article shows that for every idea you think that will make breakthrough in business or technology, it is important to have clear plan and actions to implement this idea rather than just building on the ideas and creating pool of ideas waiting for someone to help you in implementing the idea.
Home work must be done and the best start is with doing some marketing research and technical feasibility.


=============
http://blog.startupprofessionals.com/2011/03/entrepreneurs-need-fewer-hot-ideas-and.html

Entrepreneurs Need Fewer Hot Ideas and More Plans

Based on my own experience and feedback from friends, every investor is approached by at least ten entrepreneurs with a “hot idea” for a new business, for every one who has a real “plan” for a new business. That’s why I often say that ideas are worth nothing, until they are put in the context of a business plan and real people committed to executing the plan.
In fact, you can find websites full of ideas, like these “Free Innovative Ideas,” by serial entrepreneur Kim E. Lumbard of CalTech. Or you can find books of free ideas, like “Ideas,” by Matt Schoenherr, providing 101 great ideas for increasing your visibility and profitability. Most investors will tell you that they rarely see a new idea that they haven’t heard before.
I’m sure you all realize that there is quite a distance between a good idea and a good business, or even a plan for a business. Here are a few tips on how to bridge the gap. The first step is to pick one idea (that seems to be the hard part for idea people), and go to work along the following lines:
  • Do some specific market research. Scan the Internet for existing patents and some “credible unbiased third party” data that confirms there is really a market for a solution resulting from your idea. Just because you or your friends think it is a great idea or great technology, that doesn’t mean that a large number of customers will buy it.

  • Make sure the idea is technically viable. I hear many ideas that sound more like dreams, rather than products. It’s not hard to come up with the idea that a cure for cancer would make a great business, but some things are harder than they look. You need some evidence of a real solution before any business plan makes sense.
  • Draft a business plan summary. Rather than starting with a full business plan, I recommend that you start with an executive summary of a couple of pages, or an executive level presentation of maybe ten charts. It’s easier to see the big picture, and find out if your strategy can excite people before you work on a detailed plan.
  • Prepare 5-year financial projections. For most people, this is the hardest part, because it forces you to contemplate real costs, prices, delivery, and volumes. Yet these are the elements that make a business, so without them no one can assess the potential for success or failure. Don’t spend time on precision here – that comes later.
  • Start your search for key resources. These would include people and money first, and maybe software or manufacturing later to produce and deliver the solution. Other important elements of every business include the name, logo, type of company, licenses, location, advisors, and operational details.
Obviously, some of these can and should be started and executed in parallel, rather than sequentially, depending on your own time and skills. Don’t be surprised if your base idea changes considerably as you learn more about the market, technology, and the sales process. It’s a lot cheaper to learn it early, rather than after spending critical time and money.
If at all feasible, I recommend starting your rollout early with a pilot or “beta” phase, before the main rollout. You will be amazed at how much you learn about the market, the scope of the opportunity, and the real product features required. Iterate at this level to get it right before you try to scale up, or even finalize the plan.
So if you know someone who is always talking about their hot ideas, just suggest, like the investors I know, that they come back for money when they have completed the above steps. The reality is that customers only pay for solutions, and there is no market for ideas. Everyone dreams of having the magic “million dollar idea,” but I haven’t seen one yet.
Marty Zwilling

Friday, 3 June 2011

Google versus Apple

Google versus Apple: Same Exterior, Different Innovation Engines


Very interesting article on how two big innovators are very successful but use different innovation approaches. The main point that this article indicates in my opinion that innovation is not about the tool or process the company is using, it is more about how they clearly define their objective, how they communicate the objective and how they implement it without focusing on the external/internal distractions.

Lot of companies fail to copy Google or Apple's innovation techniques because they focus on the tool rather than the objective or vision of their company so they end up with dealing with different techniques or using different tools that are not matched with their objective.

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Get Ready for Open Innovation




by Stefan Lindegaard
The leaders of successful small companies understand how important it is to have the right people in the right position. When resources are slim, the ability of everyone to do their job well matters tremendously. One or two weak links can spell the difference between success and failure. So it will come as no surprise when I say that people matter more than ideas when it comes to making innovation of all types happen.
You should take a moment to think about that because many innovation initiatives fail miserably because their leaders don’t understand this simple fact. In fact, it is actually more important to have grade-A people than it is to have a slew of grade-A ideas. Why? Because grade-A people can take a grade-B idea—or perhaps even a grade-C idea—and turn it into a successful reality. Grade-B people, on the other hand, will struggle with even truly great ideas.
If we take this to world of small business, the big question is whether you have enough available grade-A people within your organization who can take great ideas, whether they come from inside or outside the company, and turn them into reality.
When large corporations tackle this question, their answer is simple; with their large body of employees, they can easily switch great people to other projects. But for a small company with its smaller staff, you simply don’t have the ability to do that. In this case, it is particularly critical to identify and develop people with the attributes and skills needed to turn an idea into a finished product or service. So before you get all fired up about generating a ton of ideas, first figure out how you’re going to match those ideas to people who can make things happen.
As you start this work, here’s another key point to remember: The skills needed to lead and manage a project within the existing core business—where innovation is likely to be incremental and resources plentiful—are significantly different from the skills needed to overcome the challenges and obstacles that greet almost any new business project involving breakthrough or radical innovation. And this is especially challenging in small companies where resources may be hard to come by. You need to staff new business projects with people who have a mindset and toolbox that match this different challenge.
You also need different people for the different phases of the innovation process, which presents another challenge for small companies. Just as some entrepreneurs are better at running a company at its very early stage and others are better at helping the business scale once the product is launched, so, too, are there intrapreneurs who are better suited both in terms of mindset and skills to various phases of the innovation process.
For example, the discovery-innovation-acceleration (D-I-A) model of innovation put forward by the Radical Innovation Group identifies three phases of innovation:
Discovery:
  • Basic research: internal and external hunting.
  • Creation, recognition, elaboration, and articulation of opportunities.
Incubation:
  • Application development: technical, market learning, market creation, strategic domains.
  • Evolving opportunities into business propositions: creating a working hypothesis about what the technology platform could enable in the market, what the market space will ultimately look like, and what the business model will be.
Acceleration:
  • Early market entry: focus, respond, invest.
  • Ramping up the fledgling business to a point where it can stand on its own, relative to other business platforms in the ultimate receiving unit.
This model has been used with success at many companies, which have learned that only very few people have the skills to move from heading the project in the discovery phase to heading it during the acceleration phase. The challenge this presents for small companies is obvious. With far fewer personnel to choose from, it can be tough to fill all the slots identified in this model. The good thing is that you can identify people with the right mindset and then start working on their toolbox. Making people more ready for innovation by continuously developing their toolbox is one of the low-hanging fruits and this can be done in small as well as big companies.

Thursday, 19 May 2011

Why Self-Employed Consultants Fail - BusinessWeek

Why Self-Employed Consultants Fail - BusinessWeek

Common blunders include neglecting to position themselves effectively, mistaking process with problem-solving, and billing by the hour, says Alan Weiss

Many former executives who have been downsized or have taken early retirement in recent years are consulting today. Rather than making a healthy profit, most scrape by or fall on their faces, says Alan Weiss, president of Summit Consulting Group in East Greenwich, R.I.Weiss recently wrote The Consulting Bible, a how-to on establishing a lucrative practice. Weiss, whose 1992 book, Million Dollar Consulting, is in its fourth edition, spoke recently with Smart Answers columnist Karen E. Klein about what it takes to make a solo consultancy thrive.

Karen E. Klein: How many people in the U.S. work as consultants?

Alan Weiss: There are about 400,000 people in the U.S. calling themselves consultants. My estimate is that only half of them are actually working as consultants. Most enter the profession as a second career or after they're retired.

What is the most important thing to know about the consulting business?

It's really a marketing business. Even if you go into it with a great approach or methodology, that's not nearly sufficient.

What big mistakes do consultants make?

They charge by the hour. As a solo consultant, you should only bill on value and you should only deal with an economic buyer—somebody who can write a check for you. Don't deal with a middleman.

I used to think that most consultants were undercapitalized and that was their big problem. What I know now is that the main problem is self-esteem. It doesn't matter what their age, gender, or culture is, most consultants do not see themselves as their clients' peers, but as subordinates. They're obsequious and they come to the job hat in hand. If you want to make six figures, you can't have that mindset.

How can consultants begin to view themselves as peers, rather than subordinates?

You have to create intellectual property and become a thought leader. You have to own a niche. When you do, people will come to you. You can go out there with a kind of pizzazz or you can have the image of a vendor.

Why is lack of self-esteem such a problem for the self-employed?

Becoming self-employed as a consultant exacerbates the problem most people have. When you work in a company, someone else can be the front man and you can hide and just poke your head out when you have something you feel strong about.

When you're out on your own, the poor self-esteem issues rise to the surface. And one-third of people don't have good support systems among their spouses and friends. Instead of encouraging them, these people are saying, "Go back to work. You're never going to make it on your own!"

What do you mean by "bill on value"?

Get an agreement with the buyer on objectives and metrics. Then ask them, "If we meet your objectives, what's the impact on your organization?" If you're going to help save a company a million dollars or improve their market position by $2.5 million, you can get a 10-1 or better return. So you can make $100,000 or $250,000 for those jobs.

When you're talking to the right buyers, they don't blink at those figures. That's what they're paying to have someone spray the plants in their offices every year. And that gets back to the right buyer: Don't deal with a trainer or an HR person; deal with the person who is authorized to spend that money.

How does billing on value change the way a consultant performs?

Your fee is not based on how often you show up or how long you take. Unlike when you're billing by the hour, the faster you solve someone's problem, the more valuable you are. If you charge by the hour, you're in an ethical conflict because you're tempted to drag out the process.

If you can fix something in a day, you're happy and the client's happy.

How does a consultant get past gatekeepers and pitch the economic buyer you mentioned?

You get them to come to you. When you do that, you don't have any problem with credibility and fees are an academic matter. The platinum standard is a peer-to-peer reference. The gold standard is a commercially published book. It doesn't matter how many you sell. I made $2.5 million from my first book because decision-makers saw my name, HarperCollins, and the word "strategy."

A corporate buyer will be attracted to people who are posting articles, writing columns, online as well as in hard copy. The more you do that, the more you speak at major conferences. Speaking, networking, publishing, going to conferences are all great ways to get buyers to come to you. Trade associations are great: Many times you're being paid to address 200 buyers in the audience.

What recommendations do you have for the consulting process?

Don't arbitrarily use a methodology. Come in and find out what has to be improved. Use observed evidence and create something for that situation.

So many consultants have solutions searching for problems. They go in with their methodology and try to find a place to use it. Everybody's fond of telling you what they want: a two-day leadership conference, a person coached for a month. Your value-added is to ask what they want, and discover what they need. That's where you get higher fees.

You have companies coming to you. How do you choose which ones to work with?

I don't pursue companies that need remedial help. Pursue companies that have money and are already leading the pack. In most cases, these firms don't have competitors nipping at their heels, so they don't have high standards. You can help them improve their productivity, become more global and more customer-oriented.

I turn down some business that's not in my sweet spot; I give them a referral. Lousy prospects make terrible clients. If you have a meeting with a potential client who shows up late, cuts off your sentences, runs people in his organization down, and spends the time complaining, you don't want to work with him. Get out of there. If you're carrying around all these lousy clients, you won't have time to reach out for the good ones.

What advice do you have for someone just starting out in consulting?

No. 1, get together a marketing approach; have an Internet presence; have hard copy materials that include your company name, logo, and branding.

Then call everyone you know: all your contacts in civic organizations, your family, social, and college networks, your last employer. Tell them, "Here's what I'm doing these days. If you have a need for this, I'd love to talk to you; if you know someone who needs this, I'd love it if you'd put us together." You can't be shy, you can't be bashful or feel like you're imposing. If you include your dentist and your doctor on the list, you'll probably contact about 200 people and you will get leads and business.

Then you give yourself six months or eight months to make that first sale, and in 12 or 15 months you should be able to support yourself and your family. If that's not happening, this may not work for you and you should go back into the workforce—or go raise rabbits someplace.

Karen E. Klein is a Los Angeles-based writer who covers entrepreneurship and small-business issues.